not believe it. I knew that the plots are often anti-Semitic, they think that the Twin Towers were destroyed by Bush and similar nonsense, but we believe central banks (Fed, ECB, BOE and Company) that the thieves had never heard ... There are sites like signoraggio.com webofdebt.com or that failing to find possible Masonic conspiracies they pick on banks plants. Here are some of the questions posed, the other comment below in more detail:
1) But because the government can not buy back the securities issued by printing new currency, wiping out its debt?
Here, a person who asks a question like that maybe he should learn a little more. I do not say buy a book of Monetary Economics, but at least read Wikipedia for a couple of minutes.
The answer is very simple: if the state (eg the USA) to buy back the securities the world would enter into a veritable tornado of inflation. 20% more than inflation as the time of Charles. There are many cases of governments that crazy printed too much money, and led to the collapse of their country.
2) And many adds: it is not true that co mprando his shares creates inflation, rather decrease!
Here too is a 'nonsense. Some Ellen Brown (webofdebt.com) says that you do not create inflation because the government securities (such as USA) are nothing more than a substitute for real currency, and thus buying back there is nothing to replace securities with real currency.
Ellen This is also an example: "You have $ 20,000, go to a broker, you should buy $ 10,000 of bonds, and $ 10,000 of shares. After making the purchases, how much money do you have? $ 20,000. "No, and here are wrong. The investor gave $ 10,000 to a public company, and $ 10,000 to the state (suppose to be IPO)! Continue.
Ellen adds:" The Broker will calls, and tells you that the bonds were "reimbursed''(or Called) state with newly printed money (because he wanted to cancel the debt.) Okay, how much money you have now? $ 20,000!" No, you have $ 10,000 in cash, and still have $ 10,000 of shares.
If the reasoning of Ellen was true here as it would be the situation:
The investor has $ 10,000 in cash, and $ 10,000 in shares. In addition 'the State would have the $ 10,000 that the investor had given him to buy the securities at the beginning. We then went from $ 20000 to 30000 $....
growth of 50% of the amount 'of money!
And according to print money to buy back these securities would not cause inflation ... Well, lucky them ...
Answers to Ellen I got them from this piece of article criticizing Ellen very funny. There are many more! If you want to have more laughter, visit it!
1) But because the government can not buy back the securities issued by printing new currency, wiping out its debt?
Here, a person who asks a question like that maybe he should learn a little more. I do not say buy a book of Monetary Economics, but at least read Wikipedia for a couple of minutes.
The answer is very simple: if the state (eg the USA) to buy back the securities the world would enter into a veritable tornado of inflation. 20% more than inflation as the time of Charles. There are many cases of governments that crazy printed too much money, and led to the collapse of their country.
2) And many adds: it is not true that co mprando his shares creates inflation, rather decrease!
Here too is a 'nonsense. Some Ellen Brown (webofdebt.com) says that you do not create inflation because the government securities (such as USA) are nothing more than a substitute for real currency, and thus buying back there is nothing to replace securities with real currency.
Ellen This is also an example: "You have $ 20,000, go to a broker, you should buy $ 10,000 of bonds, and $ 10,000 of shares. After making the purchases, how much money do you have? $ 20,000. "No, and here are wrong. The investor gave $ 10,000 to a public company, and $ 10,000 to the state (suppose to be IPO)! Continue.
Ellen adds:" The Broker will calls, and tells you that the bonds were "reimbursed''(or Called) state with newly printed money (because he wanted to cancel the debt.) Okay, how much money you have now? $ 20,000!" No, you have $ 10,000 in cash, and still have $ 10,000 of shares.
If the reasoning of Ellen was true here as it would be the situation:
The investor has $ 10,000 in cash, and $ 10,000 in shares. In addition 'the State would have the $ 10,000 that the investor had given him to buy the securities at the beginning. We then went from $ 20000 to 30000 $....
growth of 50% of the amount 'of money!
And according to print money to buy back these securities would not cause inflation ... Well, lucky them ...
Answers to Ellen I got them from this piece of article criticizing Ellen very funny. There are many more! If you want to have more laughter, visit it!
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> 
0 comments:
Post a Comment